%1

As required by Government Code section 11346.8(c), and Title 1, section 44 of the California Code of Regulations, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is providing notice of additional changes to the proposed regulation to repeal and add a new Article 6 to Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations.

-

Modifications to the text of the proposed Clear and Reasonable Warnings regulation based on comments received.  Clarifying changes made to the proposed text of the regulations, most of which are non-substantive.  Public comments available.

Availability of the Procedure for Prioritizing Candidate Chemicals for Consideration Under Proposition 65 by the "State's Qualified Experts"

Tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, and malathion listed effective May 20, 2016 as known to the State of California to cause cancer.

Prioritization of 5 Chemicals for consultation by the Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant Identification Committee: Nickel, pentachlorophenol, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and tetrachloroethylene

This Final Statement of Reasons establishes No Significant Risk Levels (NSRLs) for Benzidine, bis(2- chloroethyl)ether, N-nitrosodiethylamine, N-nitrosodimethylamine, N-nitrosodiphenylamine, N-Nitroso-N-dibutylamine, N-nitroso-N-ethylurea, N-nitroso-N-methylurea, Toxaphene and 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol.

This final statement of reasons sets forth the reasons for the final language adopted by the Agency for section 12901, and responds to the objections and recommendations submitted regarding the regulation as originally proposed at the July, 1988 hearing, and as modified by the October, 1988 emergency adoption. 

The purpose of this regulation is to provide a "safe harbor" level for toluene of 7,000 mlcrograms per day.